microplastics

Tag: microplastics

Plastic debris gathered from the ocean. Photo courtesy of NOAA.

Building a library of microplastics in the Salish Sea

By Shannon Black
Microplastics are found throughout the Salish Sea, but “surprisingly little is known about the sources of these particles,” report Canadian scientists who presented their findings last spring at the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. Now the group, led by Dr. Peter Ross at the Vancouver Aquarium is working to categorize the types of microplastics being found in the world’s oceans with the hope of identifying their origins and stopping the problem at its source.
The team is using Fourier Transform Infra Red spectrometry (FTIR) to create an imaging database of confirmed particles. Much of what the team has found so far in British Columbia — roughly 75% of it — includes plastic microfibers that are in especially high concentrations in waters near urban centers. Scientists suspect these fibers are coming from sources such as synthetic sweaters and other clothing that shed microplastics when they are washed. The water then passes through wastewater treatment plants directly into the Salish Sea.
Microplastics are defined as plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size and vary in shape, color, chemical composition, and density. Manufactured plastics fall under the category of primary microplastics, which include nurdles and microbeads. Nurdles are small plastic pellets approximately the same size as a lentil, mass quantities of which are melted to form nearly all macroplastics. Annually the United States manufactures approximately 60 billion pounds of nurdles. Microbeads can be found in some exfoliates and even toothpastes, however, they were nationally banned in 2015 as part of the Microbead-Free Water Act. Secondary microplastics are the byproduct of larger pieces of plastic that have been fragmented through the processes of photodegradation and/or mechanical weathering. These processes are made more extreme when plastics end up in the oceans where shade is nonexistent, solar radiation is inescapable and the physical forces of waves are continuous.
While the health impacts of microplastics are not yet well understood, Ross says the particles are of special concern because they are regularly ingested by invertebrates like shellfish as well as zooplankton at the bottom of the food chain. “We’re encountering a pollutant unlike any pollutant we’ve ever seen before,” Ross told the CBC.
This story was produced as part of the Puget Sound Institute’s coverage of findings presented at the 2018 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. Read more stories from the series on the Encyclopedia of Puget Sound. 

Plastic debris gathered from the ocean. Photo courtesy of NOAA.

Building a library of microplastics in the Salish Sea

By Shannon Black
Microplastics are found throughout the Salish Sea, but “surprisingly little is known about the sources of these particles,” report Canadian scientists who presented their findings last spring at the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. Now the group, led by Dr. Peter Ross at the Vancouver Aquarium is working to categorize the types of microplastics being found in the world’s oceans with the hope of identifying their origins and stopping the problem at its source.
The team is using Fourier Transform Infra Red spectrometry (FTIR) to create an imaging database of confirmed particles. Much of what the team has found so far in British Columbia — roughly 75% of it — includes plastic microfibers that are in especially high concentrations in waters near urban centers. Scientists suspect these fibers are coming from sources such as synthetic sweaters and other clothing that shed microplastics when they are washed. The water then passes through wastewater treatment plants directly into the Salish Sea.
Microplastics are defined as plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size and vary in shape, color, chemical composition, and density. Manufactured plastics fall under the category of primary microplastics, which include nurdles and microbeads. Nurdles are small plastic pellets approximately the same size as a lentil, mass quantities of which are melted to form nearly all macroplastics. Annually the United States manufactures approximately 60 billion pounds of nurdles. Microbeads can be found in some exfoliates and even toothpastes, however, they were nationally banned in 2015 as part of the Microbead-Free Water Act. Secondary microplastics are the byproduct of larger pieces of plastic that have been fragmented through the processes of photodegradation and/or mechanical weathering. These processes are made more extreme when plastics end up in the oceans where shade is nonexistent, solar radiation is inescapable and the physical forces of waves are continuous.
While the health impacts of microplastics are not yet well understood, Ross says the particles are of special concern because they are regularly ingested by invertebrates like shellfish as well as zooplankton at the bottom of the food chain. “We’re encountering a pollutant unlike any pollutant we’ve ever seen before,” Ross told the CBC.
This story was produced as part of the Puget Sound Institute’s coverage of findings presented at the 2018 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. Read more stories from the series on the Encyclopedia of Puget Sound. 

“All That Glitter? It’s Not Good, Critics Say” Photo courtesy of New York Times.

The perils of holiday glitter

By Jeff Rice, Puget Sound Institute
You might want to think twice before adding that extra bit of sparkle this holiday season. A growing number of environmental activists and scientists are saying it’s time to hold the glitter.
PSI Director Joel Baker is quoted this week in The New York Times on the connection between glitter and harmful microplastics.
Some groups, including most recently a chain of child care centers in Britain, are proposing a ban on the shimmery plastic saying it can be easily consumed, causing unknown health effects. But concerns go well beyond the potential ingestion by young children during craft time. Scientists confirm that glitter, as with most microplastics, has a tendency to find its way into the ocean and other waterbodies where it can be passed through the food chain from invertebrates and fish on up to humans.
The New York Times reports:  “Joel Baker, a marine pollution expert at the University of Washington Tacoma, said glitter was just one of the many, many types of plastics that pollute waterways. But one thing sets it apart from other pollutants: It sticks around, conspicuously, in the most unwanted places.”
“A little bit of glitter goes a long way,” he told the paper. “Weeks after a kid’s birthday party, there’s still glitter all over your car.”
Baker and his colleagues at the University of Washington Center for Urban Waters are among the leading experts on the occurrence of microplastics in the world’s oceans and have conducted numerous related studies around the Puget Sound region.
Microplastics are defined as pieces of plastic that are smaller than 5 millimeters. They are typically created when larger pieces of plastic debris break down into smaller pieces in the environment, but some types of microplastics such as scrubbing beads in toothpastes and exfoliating products that were manufactured to be small have recently been banned. Could glitter be next?
Fans of certain types of glitter need not worry, however. The Times reports that some manufacturers are now creating biodegradable versions of glitter to ensure a sparkly, but healthy holiday season.

“All That Glitter? It’s Not Good, Critics Say” Photo courtesy of New York Times.

The perils of holiday glitter

By Jeff Rice, Puget Sound Institute
You might want to think twice before adding that extra bit of sparkle this holiday season. A growing number of environmental activists and scientists are saying it’s time to hold the glitter.
PSI Director Joel Baker is quoted this week in The New York Times on the connection between glitter and harmful microplastics.
Some groups, including most recently a chain of child care centers in Britain, are proposing a ban on the shimmery plastic saying it can be easily consumed, causing unknown health effects. But concerns go well beyond the potential ingestion by young children during craft time. Scientists confirm that glitter, as with most microplastics, has a tendency to find its way into the ocean and other waterbodies where it can be passed through the food chain from invertebrates and fish on up to humans.
The New York Times reports:  “Joel Baker, a marine pollution expert at the University of Washington Tacoma, said glitter was just one of the many, many types of plastics that pollute waterways. But one thing sets it apart from other pollutants: It sticks around, conspicuously, in the most unwanted places.”
“A little bit of glitter goes a long way,” he told the paper. “Weeks after a kid’s birthday party, there’s still glitter all over your car.”
Baker and his colleagues at the University of Washington Center for Urban Waters are among the leading experts on the occurrence of microplastics in the world’s oceans and have conducted numerous related studies around the Puget Sound region.
Microplastics are defined as pieces of plastic that are smaller than 5 millimeters. They are typically created when larger pieces of plastic debris break down into smaller pieces in the environment, but some types of microplastics such as scrubbing beads in toothpastes and exfoliating products that were manufactured to be small have recently been banned. Could glitter be next?
Fans of certain types of glitter need not worry, however. The Times reports that some manufacturers are now creating biodegradable versions of glitter to ensure a sparkly, but healthy holiday season.

PSI will host a wide variety of sessions and panels at the 2018 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference logo
Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference logo

The announcements are in and Puget Sound Institute researchers will be chairing or co-chairing at least five different special sessions at next year’s Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. The sessions will include subjects as varied as Contaminants of Emerging Concern, microplastics, Pacific herring, ecosystem modeling and the potential influence of the region’s technology industry on Salish Sea recovery. Watch this space in the coming months for more details on these sessions and for in-depth coverage of the conference as it develops.
 

PSI will host a wide variety of sessions and panels at the 2018 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference

Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference logo
Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference logo

The announcements are in and Puget Sound Institute researchers will be chairing or co-chairing at least five different special sessions at next year’s Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference in Seattle. The sessions will include subjects as varied as Contaminants of Emerging Concern, microplastics, Pacific herring, ecosystem modeling and the potential influence of the region’s technology industry on Salish Sea recovery. Watch this space in the coming months for more details on these sessions and for in-depth coverage of the conference as it develops.
 

Assessing microplastics in the world’s oceans

Microplastics in the Ocean: A Global Assessment
Microplastics in the Ocean: A Global Assessment

Our Director Joel Baker recently co-authored Microplastics in the Ocean: A Global Assessment, an international report commissioned by GESAMP (The Joint Group of Experts on Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection). GESAMP is an inter-Agency Body of the United Nations, comprised of a group of independent scientists providing advice to UN Agencies on a wide variety of ocean matters. The report examined the global distribution of micro plastic particles, their known and hypothesized effects on marine organisms, and evaluated potential solutions.
Download the report.